Our critique of
CNN
Analysis #462 · July 28, 2026 · 2 min read
Politics
Text size
The Plane Seats Were Bolted In Wrong. By Absolutely No One.
CNN: "were incorrectly installed"Reuters ran the same passive453 jets, up to 69 seats each"Not correctly installed in the seat tracks" — FAAOwner: Warner Bros. Discovery
👁Decoded
Monday's aviation news came with a free grammar lesson. CNN's headline: "Seats on hundreds of Boeing 737 MAX jets were incorrectly installed, FAA says." Read it twice. Now try to answer one small question: installed by whom? * The one-sentence version of the actual news: the FAA proposed a directive covering 453 US-registered 737 MAXs after getting a report that passenger seat assemblies "were not correctly installed in the seat tracks" — meaning in an emergency landing, the seats could come loose and hurt the people sitting in them. * Back to the missing person. CNN's headline doesn't name an installer. Reuters went with "FAA says seats on hundreds of Boeing 737 MAX were incorrectly installed" — same construction, same vacancy. Even the FAA's own sentence is passive. Somewhere in this story there is a human being with a torque wrench, and every layer of it has agreed not to look for them. * Notice that Boeing IS in every headline — as an adjective. "Boeing 737 MAX jets," the way you'd say "Toyota parking lot." The brand shows up to identify the furniture; it just never has to conjugate a verb. After the decade this plane has had — two crashes, a door plug that got off mid-flight without using the stairs — newsrooms have gotten very good at writing around the question of who does things at Boeing. * And the scale deserves a subject. Up to 69 seat assemblies per jet, across 453 jets — as many as 31,000 seats, each needing an estimated hour of labor to fix. One crooked seat is an oops. Thirty-one thousand is a process, and processes have owners. * To be fair to the reporters: the FAA's proposal doesn't name the installer either, and you can't print a name you don't have — maybe it's the factory line, maybe a supplier, maybe somebody's retrofit. But there's an honest sentence for that: "and nobody's saying who did it." That sentence has teeth. "Were incorrectly installed" is the same information with the teeth filed down. * We've flagged this move before when the subject was a police shooting — "shots were fired," by nobody, at no one. Turns out the passive voice is aviation-grade: load-tested, fire-resistant, and always available when someone needs to not be in the sentence.
“Somewhere in this story there's a human with a torque wrench, and every layer of it agreed not to look for them.”
Comments (4)
Comments are screened before posting. Use Report to flag a comment — reports are reviewed by our editorial team within 24 hours — or Block to hide an author.
ringsend_rambler
grand read. boeing headlines have been subjectless for years at this point, someone had to say it
43d ago
TeaFirstThenMilk
reading this while the faa orders inspections on hundreds of jets and the sentences still have no subject. uncanny
44d ago
EleanorB
'By absolutely no one' — I said exactly this out loud at yesterday's FAA story. The seats apparently bolted themselves in. Wonderful piece.
44d ago
deadline_dan
Old desk rule: the passive is what legal signs off on before the NTSB reports back. Not defending it — but that headline was lawyered, not written.
44d ago