The Fund Would Pay the President's Allies $1.776 Billion. Fox's Headline Called It 'a Fund.'
Fox: 'rescinding $1.8B fund'DOJ's own name: 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'NPR: first president to settle with his own DOJCornyn & Tillis held the vote hostageOwner: Murdoch family
πDecoded
Fox News, Monday: "Todd Blanche moves closer to confirmation after rescinding $1.8B fund." Fox again on Tuesday, as the Judiciary Committee voted 12-10 to advance him: "Todd Blanche inches closer to confirmation after Cornyn strikes IRS settlement deal." Read those cold and you'd think a tidy nominee trimmed a budget line and a senator did some routine dealmaking.
*
Here's what "a fund" was. The Justice Department's own press release called it the "Anti-Weaponization Fund": $1.776 billion, created in May as part of a settlement of Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over his leaked tax returns β a lawsuit a federal judge had already dismissed at the $10 billion sticker price. The fund's job, per NPR: potentially compensating "allies of the president and Jan. 6 rioters." And the settlement itself, also per NPR, was "the first known instance of a president reaching such a settlement with the government he leads."
*
So: the president sued the government, the government he runs settled with him, and the settlement built a nine-figure-a-year apology machine for his friends. Fox's headline budget for all of that: "$1.8B fund."
*
Even the dollar figure is in on it. Of every number a settlement could land on, this one landed on 1.776 billion β the most patriotic four digits American money can spell. That's not an amount, that's a costume. Rounding it to "$1.8B" isn't simplifying the story; it's dry-cleaning it.
*
Other whitelist entries managed more. NBC: "Acting AG Todd Blanche reaches deal with holdout senators to scrap $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' fund" β those quote marks around the name are doing honest work. The Washington Post: "standoff over Trump fund" β two words, and suddenly the fund has an owner. NPR's own headline was procedural mush too, in fairness ("advances Blanche nomination, setting up a final vote"), but its story delivered everything: including the detail that the DOJ's clarification of the tax-audit shield for Trump, his family and his companies came in a second statement that nobody signed.
*
And the paragraph that deserves the top slot everywhere: the order kills the fund, but legal experts told NPR it could be resurrected with a new order β and the underlying settlement still requires the attorney general to create it. The fund isn't dead. It's in a drawer, next to a pen.
*
One more thing Fox's "Cornyn strikes deal" framing smooths over: who the holdouts were. John Cornyn and Thom Tillis β the only two committee Republicans who said no β are both leaving Congress, both after Trump backed or threatened primary challengers against them. The last two guys with nothing left to lose demanded the fund's death certificate in writing, got it, voted yes, and the nomination rolled on.
*
"Rescinding $1.8B fund" is accurate the way "man returns wallet" is accurate when it was his own wallet the whole time. When the story is the president's Justice Department un-writing a check to the president's allies so the president's lawyer can run the Justice Department β the least a headline can do is say whose fund it was.
βThe fund isn't dead. It's in a drawer, next to a pen.β
Comments (4)
jornolurker
'a fund' doing olympic level heavy lifting there
14d ago
NorthsideNuala
1776. subtle lads. very subtle
14d ago
EleanorB
$1.776 billion and the headline said 'a fund.' The number IS the story.
14d ago
SkepticalSue
The number 1.776 is doing more work than the word 'fund' ever could. 'On the nose' doesn't begin to cover it.