Our critique of
Russia Today (RT)
Analysis #855 · September 4, 2026 · 2 min read
Politics
Text size
When Moscow Claims a Strike, Russia 'Hits.' When Kyiv Reports One, Ukraine 'Accuses.'
"Ukraine accuses Russia" — RT"The alleged Russian attack""Russia hits… – MOD" (the other verb)First hit on SBU HQ in the whole warOwner: Russian Government
👁Decoded
A Russian drone hit the headquarters of Ukraine's SBU intelligence agency today — broad daylight, central Kyiv, opposite the St Sophia Cathedral, at least nine people wounded, the first time that building has been reached in four and a half years of war. That's the background. Here's the coverage. * The Guardian: "Russia strikes Ukraine intelligence HQ in 'major escalation'." CNN: "Russia strikes Ukraine Security Service headquarters in central Kyiv." France 24: "Russia hits SBU headquarters." And RT: "Ukraine accuses Russia of striking SBU building in Kiev (VIDEO)." Spot the headline where the drone has no pilot. * Inside RT's version, the event dissolves further. Zelensky is "claiming" the drone was aimed at the intelligence chief's office. The whole thing is "the alleged Russian attack." A military drone, in the capital of a country Russia has been bombing daily for over a week, flew into the front office of the security service — and RT files it as an open case. Sender unknown. Return address smudged. They even attached "(VIDEO)" — footage of the thing they can't bring themselves to attribute. * Now, attribution is a fine journalistic habit. We spend half our life here begging outlets to say who claims what. So let's check whether this is RT's actual grammar or a special weekend offer. From RT's own recent shelf: "Russia hits Kiev drone-manufacturing plant – MOD." "Russia strikes Ukrainian exhibition of drones used in attacks on civilians – MOD." "Ukrainian drone attack on strategic enterprise foiled – FSB." When the Russian Defense Ministry claims a strike, the verb is declarative and the ministry gets a polite little dash at the end, like a signature on a delivery slip. Russia hits. Russia strikes. Fact, fact. * So the house rules, assembled: a strike exists the moment Moscow's ministry says so, and enters a permanent fog of allegation when Kyiv's president says so — even with the smoke still over Volodymyrska Street and the video in RT's own headline. That's not caution. Caution is a standard you apply in both directions. Applied in one direction only, it's just loyalty wearing caution's jacket. * The SBU building took its first hit of the entire war today, on camera, in daylight. The only mystery RT couldn't crack was where drones over Kyiv keep coming from.
“Same sky, two grammars: 'hits' when Moscow claims it, 'alleged' when Kyiv reports it.”
Comments (6)
Comments are screened before posting. Use Report to flag a comment — reports are reviewed by our editorial team within 24 hours — or Block to hide an author.
jornolurker
return address smudged. lovely line, grim story
4h ago
RathminesReader
Small pushback: 'Ukraine accuses' was technically accurate at time of filing. The tell isn't one headline, it's that RT's hedge only ever points one direction — which your France 24 comparison showed better than the outrage would have.
9h ago
LiffeyLurker
read this on the bus and started noticing it in every warzone headline since. can't unsee
12h ago
ZeynepReads
the (VIDEO) detail is everything. they attached footage of the thing they refuse to attribute. an event with evidence but no author
20h ago
media101prof
Teaching this next week. 'Spot the headline where the drone has no pilot' is the cleanest one-line definition of agency deletion I've come across.
22h ago
DonnybrookDoubter
same sky, two grammars is the whole outlet in five words
1d ago