Our critique of
Fox News
Β· 3 min read
Politics
Text size

He Won the Primary. Fox Covered the Funeral.

Fox: "socialist Abdul El-Sayed"NPR: "Progressive"NBC: "victory for the left""Near-disaster" β€” about a winOwner: Murdoch family
πŸ‘Decoded

Abdul El-Sayed won Michigan's Democratic Senate primary Tuesday night. Beat the establishment favorite, survived what Fox itself counts as "more than $80 million" in primary spending, most of it aimed at his face. That's the news. Here's how it got dressed.

NPR's headline: "Progressive Abdul El-Sayed wins Michigan's Democratic primary for Senate." NBC called it "a Midwest victory for the left." Fox went with: "Republicans get the Democrat they wanted as socialist Abdul El-Sayed wins Michigan Senate primary." Read that again. The man won the election, and in the headline, the people receiving something are Republicans.

If this feels familiar, it's because we've been keeping the file. Monday, Fox covered the run-up to this primary like an armed uprising β€” "insurgency" everywhere. Yesterday, we flagged Fox stamping "socialist" on El-Sayed as flat fact, even though Fox's own July headline had him saying "I'm simply not a socialist." Now he's won, and the label didn't just survive the victory β€” it got a promotion into the winner's announcement.

And the volume. Fox's own August 5 sitemap lists five separate El-Sayed stories in a single day: the "Republicans get the Democrat they wanted" one, a "leftward lurch" one, a "socialist allies" one, one about "$100,000 from dozens of members of group with alleged terror ties," and a David Marcus column headlined: "Experts crowned El-Sayed β€” then Michigan voters turned his win into a near-disaster." A near-disaster. The win. The one he won.

Here's the grammar trick in the big headline, because it's genuinely elegant: Democratic voters chose a nominee, but "Republicans get the Democrat they wanted" makes the voters disappear entirely. Millions of dollars told Michigan not to do this; Michigan did it anyway. You could write that as voters overruling money. Fox wrote it as a gift someone else unwrapped.

To be fair to the frame: the Republican Senate committee really did run ads boosting El-Sayed's profile, and the GOP really does think he's the easier opponent. That's a legitimate story, and Fox is allowed to tell it. The tell isn't any single headline. It's that across five stories in one day, the man who actually won never once gets to be the subject of a good morning.

β€œIn Fox's version of the victory, the winner wasn't on the ballot.”