On Thursday Trump signed two executive orders — one narrowing who gets citizenship at birth, one denying visas to people the administration says travel here to give birth — weeks after the Supreme Court upheld the 14th Amendment and binned his first attempt. That's the event. Now the fun part: every headline about it had to pass two tests, and nobody passed both. * Test one: does the headline remember that the Supreme Court already killed version 1.0? This is not optional context. An executive order signed AFTER the country's highest court said no is a completely different story from an executive order. The Washington Post passed with style points: "Trump tries new tack against birthright citizenship after Supreme Court snub." The Court is right there in the headline. We'd just gently ask: a "snub"? A constitutional ruling on the 14th Amendment is not skipping someone's birthday party. "Snub" is feud vocabulary — it files a Supreme Court decision under interpersonal drama. * CNN and the BBC went with the word "again" — "Trump again tries to curb birthright citizenship and 'birth tourism' through executive action" and "Trump again targets US birthright citizenship." "Again" is doing honest work there: it tells you this is a rerun, even if you have to already know how the last episode ended. * And Fox? "Trump signs executive orders on birthright citizenship, birth tourism." No court, no "again," no history at all — a president calmly signing papers. But here's our favorite detail: Fox's own URL for the story ends in "after-supreme-court-setback." The web address remembers what the headline forgot. We saw this exact move on Wednesday, when Bloomberg dropped "Iran Says" from a headline while its URL kept it. URLs are written first and edited never — they're the outlet's diary before the makeup goes on. * Test two: what do you do with "birth tourism"? It's the administration's own term — the White House itself acknowledges the practice is relatively uncommon. CNN, NBC and The New York Times all put it in quotation marks: administration's word, handle with gloves. Al Jazeera's headline avoided the phrase entirely and described the thing: orders "seeking to limit US birthright citizenship." Fox printed it bare — birthright citizenship, birth tourism, no quotes — which means somewhere between the press release and the page, the administration's campaign vocabulary became plain English. * Why it matters: none of these headlines lied. But one made a Supreme Court ruling sound like a social slight, two assumed you'd seen the previous episode, and one told the story exactly the way the signing hand would want it told — with the inconvenient June ruling living only in the URL, where nobody looks.